PORT ST. JOE — The
Thirteen years later, the project has been “hijacked,”
The Gulf County Commission launched a public campaign Tuesday to lobby state, and if necessary federal, officials on what commissioners see as a project that provides little benefit to Gulf County, despite the original conception of the project.
County Administrator Don Butler said examining the timeline of the project from its inception in 2001 to the present day is to see how a project to link south Gulf County with U.S. 231 and points north, to provide a spur for economic development and tourism, has now become a highway project to benefit Bay County.
“The intent has certainly changed over the years,”
The thrust of the issue is the preferred alternative identified by engineers and the Florida Department of Transportation. That alternative, labeled No. 17, moves along Bay County 386 North to south of
That, Commissioner Ward McDaniel said, would be a great route for folks heading from
The more northerly intersection with U.S. 231 would benefit the
And the port would be dependent on an efficient four-lane highway system out of
Alternative 15 “is the only way we are going to get anything going with our port,”
Commissioner Warren Yeager said taking the parkway, and its four-lane roadway, completely out of Gulf County would significantly constrain the ability of the port to attract tenants dealing with cargo or supplies that would have be trucked.
“We need to take it beyond letters and request a meeting” with FDOT Secretary Anand Persad, Yeager said. “We need to get in front of the right people.”
Last week’s public hearing on the
Also noting the poor acoustics in the
For instance, alternatives 15 and 17 include a bridge crossing
Steve Norris, who serves on the Northwest Florida Transportation Corridor Authority, said No. 17 became an alternative during the process of engineering the project and was not originally a consideration. The alternative — calling for bridge almost twice the length of No. 15 — was included by a federal environmental agency, which Norris said was baffling.
“This project was hijacked by the (Environmental Protection Agency), the federal government,” county planner David Richardson said. “That is where (No.) 17 and (No.) 19 come from.”
Norris also noted the preferred alternative now benefits areas around Allanton. Eastern Shipbuilding has one of its main yards in Allanton.
Additionally,
The language for the appropriation from
Pat Hardman, president of the Coastal Community Association, said sending folks from
“There is nothing in here right now for